Nepal Fishery Survey 2015
Nepal, 2015 - 2016
Central Bureau of Statistics
Created on July 05, 2018
Last modified July 05, 2018
Page views 86467
Download 2582
Documentation in PDF
Metadata
DDI/XML
JSON
CASTE (FCASTE)
Data file: FISH1_REC
Overview
Valid:
2431
Invalid:
0
Type:
Discrete
Width:
19
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BADHAE | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| BANGALI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BANIYA | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| BARAE | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| BHOTE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| BRAHMAN (HILL) | 350 |
14.4%
|
|
| BRAHMAN (TARAI) | 21 |
0.9%
|
|
| Bhumihar | 23 |
0.9%
|
|
| CHAMAR/HARIJAN/RAM | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| CHHANTAL | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| CHHETRI | 322 |
13.2%
|
|
| DAMAIN/DHOLI | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| DANUWAR | 6 |
0.2%
|
|
| DARAI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DHAGAR/JHAGAR | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| DHANUK | 46 |
1.9%
|
|
| DHOBI | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| DUSADH/PASWAN/PASI | 9 |
0.4%
|
|
| GAINE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| GANGAI | 18 |
0.7%
|
|
| GHARTI/BHUJEL | 5 |
0.2%
|
|
| GURUNG | 37 |
1.5%
|
|
| HAJAM/THAKUR | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| HALUWAI | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| KAHAR | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| KALWAR | 16 |
0.7%
|
|
| KAMI | 20 |
0.8%
|
|
| KANU | 10 |
0.4%
|
|
| KAYASTHA | 4 |
0.2%
|
|
| KEWAT | 28 |
1.2%
|
|
| KHATWE | 1 |
0%
|
|
| KOIRI | 43 |
1.8%
|
|
| KUMAL | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| KUMHAR | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| KURMI | 34 |
1.4%
|
|
| LIMBU | 41 |
1.7%
|
|
| LOHAR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MAGAR | 98 |
4%
|
|
| MAJHI | 17 |
0.7%
|
|
| MALLAH | 134 |
5.5%
|
|
| MUSAHAR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| MUSLIM | 64 |
2.6%
|
|
| NEWAR | 100 |
4.1%
|
|
| NUNIYA | 8 |
0.3%
|
|
| PUNJABI/SIKH | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| RAI | 76 |
3.1%
|
|
| RAJBANSI | 44 |
1.8%
|
|
| RAJI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| RAJPUT | 10 |
0.4%
|
|
| SANTHAL/SATAR | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| SANYASI | 14 |
0.6%
|
|
| SARKI | 13 |
0.5%
|
|
| SONAR | 1 |
0%
|
|
| SUDHI | 11 |
0.5%
|
|
| TAJPURIYA | 7 |
0.3%
|
|
| TAMANG | 80 |
3.3%
|
|
| TATMA | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| TELI | 60 |
2.5%
|
|
| THAKURI | 34 |
1.4%
|
|
| THAMI | 1 |
0%
|
|
| THARU | 395 |
16.2%
|
|
| YADAV | 159 |
6.5%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.